Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Analisis Pencocokan Profil untuk Pemilihan Jurusan di Perguruan Tinggi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32627/aims.v4i2.144

Keywords:

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Siswa, Jurusan, Analisis GAP

Abstract

Selection of majors that are not in accordance with the qualifications possessed by students at Senior High School Negeri 1 Garut will be one of the inhibiting factors while the student is in college. To minimize such conditions, a decision support system is needed that can analyze student profiles with the profiles of existing majors. The goal is that the majors chosen by students are in accordance with their qualifications. The profile matching method or GAP analysis is the method used in this study. With GAP analysis, the gap between student profiles and majors profiles can be identified. The smaller GAP value is higher the match level, and vice versa. Meanwhile, the recommended major that has highest recommendation value. Based on the results of research conducted on a student named Roihana Asfahani, recommended majors based on value of knowledge, skills, talents and interests in these students are majors in the psychology with a recommendation value of 16.96.

References

Diana, Metode & Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.

S. Sunarti and J. Sundari, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Profile Matching Pada Pemilihan Rumah Tinggal,” INTENSIF, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2018.

M. B. Izatu, N. F. Muchlis, and L. . Tajidun, “Perbandingan Metode Profile Matching dan PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluation) Dalam Menentukan Siswa Layak Penerima Beasiswa Kurang Mampu di SMK Kelautan dan Perikanan Kendari,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 27–36, 2016.

Z. Hisyam and P. B. Utomo, “Analisa dan Perbandingan Metode Profile Matching dan TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Ketua OSIS,” J. Inf., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 60–66, 2020.

DIKTI (Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI), “Definisi dan Pengertian Kompetensi dan Learning Outcomes.” pp. 1–25, 2011.

R. Williams, “Perbedaan Antara Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan,” Diakses 17 September. 2020, [Online]. A vailable: https://id.bccrwp.org/compare/difference-between-knowledge-and- skills/.

L. T. Antika, “Perbandingan Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Antara Siswa Berkemampuan Akademik Tinggi dan Rendah,” Wacana Didakt., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2016.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Jaringan.” [Online]. Available: https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/.

E. Nofiani, “Pembinaan Minat dan Bakat Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus (ABK) (Studi Deskriptif di Sekolah Dasar Inklusi),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Reforming Pedagog., pp. 9–14, 2016.

D. Y. S. Putra, “Decision Support System With Method of GAP Analysis For Position Increase Process And Career Planning,” J. ISD, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 70– 83, 2017.

A. Fitriyani, R. Irma Handayani, E. Widanengsih, and S. Nusa Mandiri Jakarta, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan Pada SMK YMIK Joglo Jakarta Barat Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weigting (SAW),” Jtksi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2020.

D. R. Fatih, E. M. K., and D. K. Basuki, “DSS Untuk Rekomendasi Pemilihan Jurusan Pada Perguruan Tinggi Bagi Siswa SMU,” EEPIS Final Proj., pp. 1–6, 2010.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014, “Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah,” Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. 2014.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).